On Wed, 23 May 2012 19:52:46 -0700 (PDT), Tudor Hughes
wrote:

On May 23, 2:32*pm, Dave Ludlow
wrote:

... So it's back to the old site for me and when they pull it, I will be
off somewhere else.

I'm afraid Dave, we are not a 'key stakeholder', just a minor interest group

From Met O

I got a reply.
[snipped]
... It's like marketing a new car with a 3-speed crash gearbox.

I had a reply to my email too, which also referred to both our posts
in this thread. The relevant parts (some of which you will have seen
already in yours) a

========================
"Thank you for your ongoing feedback in connection with the UK
extremes table. Your feedback has been passed to me for review and
I've also seen an email which you wrote to UK.sci.weather...

You are not alone in wishing to see the return of the UK Extremes
table so I hope its reassuring to know your feedback will be reported
to our Public Weather Service (PWS) team for their consideration.
Everything you see on our Public Weather pages is driven by the
requirements of the Public Weather Service Customer Group (PWSCG) and
more about their framework can be found he
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/what/pws/pwscg/TOR .

Having said this, the PWS team are able to implement the return of
poplar information which the public te ll us they miss, so your
contribution will be helpful with this decision.

I cannot comment about a time scale for this work, so please bear with
us, and thank you for your patience in the meantime. Can you let Tudor
Hughes know too please?
========================

Time will tell what impact our feedback has, we can but live in hope.

--
Dave
Fareham