Lawrence13 wrote:
On Jun 23, 7:02 pm, "Col" wrote:

He gives them stick simply because the Met Office 'believes' in
AGW and he doesn't, it's as simple as that.
Any excuse to put the boot in.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Put the agw to one side Col: Do you really think an organisation that
boasts how important it is to our very lives itself is an arrogant
nanny state meddling pile of doggy do. I had to laugh reading the
other day that someone at UKMO's Peter Trevylan had won and award for
IT application for visualising weather forecasts . I then immediatley
thought of their ****e new website and yet they release a three month
precipitation forecast only seven days before the heavens opened.

You mean how you put AGW to one side in your reply to Liam Steele?
AGW is intrinsically woven in to every comment you make about
the Met Office.

Style over substance is the new mantra and they are at least good at
that.

Well name another organisation that has a better track record in
forecasting, either short range or long range.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl