On Tuesday, 28 August 2012 11:17:37 UTC+1, Joe P wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:46:50 +0100, John Hall wrote:





I've seen more abuse from you in the past week than I've seen from

Lawrence in the past five years.



Then you have a very bad blind spot, or a very selective memory.



I only searched on one word, see if you can guess what it was:



From: Lawrence13

Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather

Subject: Corbyn forecast as interpreted by Boris

Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:08:32 -0700 (PDT)





Here you **** I have a whole family on my sisters side





From: Lawrence13

Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather

Subject: OK: I. not the brightest Match in the Box

Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:18:12 -0700 (PDT)





Terry **** : You're already running, you virus plonker. I never ran

you thick ****, I took myself away in fairness to others, you great

fat useless dollop.





From: Lawrence13

Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather

Subject: OT: Richard Lindzen Presentation in Parliment last week.

Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:02:34 -0800 (PST)



You ^&*king idiot Ebenezer we won't have any ^&%$ing grandchildren you

bleedin' ****"





From: Lawrence13

Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather

Subject: Cold Spell More Likely in Near Future

Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:37:08 -0800 (PST)







then some **** says "well he said six

months ago it would snow on Cheltenham and it didn't.


__________________________________________________ _______________________________



Well Joe P in the first quote of me using the word **** was a response to Weather Lawyer calling me a Pratt. So I only returned the sentiments shown to me

Your second selective example is me responding to Taliban Terry Tibbs who responded to my perfectly innocent post about queuing systems when phoning utilities
He said this to me totally out of the blue and the context of the conversation
"****ing chav
youll be running with your tail between your so called balls again soon "

So again you seemed to have taken what's always been me just retaliating totally out of context.

Now the third fail

In a thread where I linked a presentation by Richard Lindzen it wasn't long before the abuse by Dawlish began it stated with this

"I think the only reply those rants deserve is "whatever". *))
I wonder what it is like to have your head permanently up your own
backside - the position,"

In this thread it was all good humoured banter and the quote you made was said in a fictitious scenario and was meant to be totally humorous

As for the last evidence of me being so called nasty. Well I've been through that thread and couldn't find the words that you have more then likely quoted me saying out of context. The thread itself started with me telling a joke and mentioning Joe *******i and a possible cold spell and that started an avalanche of bile towards Joe *******i which I thought was very unfair and said so.However the bulk of the thread was heated at its worst.

To be honest I I've only just been able to read some of the things said about me on a personal level as although my two main rants are UKMO and AGW and that immediately makes me a bad person. I never ever attack anyone personally and very rarely I retaliate with the language used against me
All the so called use of the word **** that you've so eagerly quoted is totally out of context and is really disgraceful. I don't expect anyone to be interested or bothered to check the said threads themselves and see how distorted your version is.

I say to you Joe P that you are a damn liar and have deliberately taken lines and words out of context to paint me in a very poor light because you do not agree with my views and comments.

You know you had me doubting my own sanity but now I've checked those four examples of trying to show how bad I am I can see all but one the threads were light hearted and jokey until I was personally insulted. One example you've quoted is a fictitious story where characters were insulting characters. The last thread about Joe *******i and another possible cold spell was started by me with a joke and that point , everyone jumped on the anti Joe Bandwagon possibly because he poo pooes AGW and that thread got a little tetchy but NO personal insults.

I've never set out to insult or hurt anyone and will only respond likewise if provoked
You've totally manipulated and twisted things I've said and that is lying Joe