Weather Banter - View Single Post

[email protected] · January 1st 05, 09:43 PM posted to uk.sci.weather

In message
(TudorHgh) wrote:

What this demonstrates, is proof that the global warming argument is
just nonsense. If the global warming argument really had solid credibility,
then they would not resort to such bull**** allegations, would
they? They would not have to.

The fluffy-brained (of which the media has much more than its fair share)
would like to see natural disasters as all of a piece and they think, at the
moment, that global warming is God, the doer and maker of all things. This is
sheer nonsense, as we all know, but it doesn't diminish in any way whatsoever
the fact of global warming, as demonstrated by the temperature record.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey

It would have been more credible if they had blamed global COOLING, ie the
cooling of and subsequent contraction of the earth's core. As I understood
it, the quake was caused by two plates moving together, so this in much more
beleivable (whether there is any truth in it I don't know).

Martin

--
Created on the Iyonix PC - the world's fastest RISC OS computer.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/m.dixon4/