I noticed when sheepishly returning to the NG
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Lawrence13 wrote:
That many who are very protective and non critical of UKMO's ludicrous
warning codswallop are less forgiving if the same same stuff comes from a
Mr Corbyn. It's as if they are caught in No Man's Land.
Me? I think they are both way OTT; the only redeeming feature for Piers
is that he isn't handicapped by H&S madness and Political Correctness.
------------------------------
The thing I don't get is why ruin what was an excellent actual forecast
for most with warnings that are exaggerated. It was marginal, it did snow
where and when they said it would but to quote what I said yesterday on
here :-"I think they don't really need to act as concerned as they are
though, because surely even if they get the regions and amounts wrong
nowhere is going to see disruption for long? It isn't really going to be
that cold in subsequent days is it? "
To me it is the warnings that are always the weak point.
Dave, S.Essex
(Mind you my step was a bit slippy with the slush on it when I went out to
look just now )
I think the point that both of you are missing is that the Met Offie has to
warn of the worst case, not what you personally will experience. For me in
Dorset, those warnings of snow were ridiculous since all we got was heavy
rain, but where the snow did fall it would only take one jack-knived lorry
to block a major trunk road and cause chaos.
But then we always were a nation of whinging poms, so I don't expect
anything I write will change that :-(
Cheers, Alastair.
|