"Lawrence13" wrote in message
...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/el...ied-about.html

Fraser laser Nelson

Very good article that puts into perspective the naive tripe about the
austere measures needed in cutting C02.

Okay if Co2 is such a powerful greenhouse gas then reducing it is going to
cool the planet according to the AGW theory. However, if apparently our
current levels of C02 are causing severe winter misery then carbon taxes are
going to add insult to injury with not only producing a far colder world as
its taken from the atmosphere but making it f*&king miserable in the process
of doing so with economic poverty in a global system already ready to keel
over with debt.

It's a lose lose situation.

================================================== ==========================
Lawrence,

You are better than this. If you look at the weather patterns this is almost
the perfect example of a negative NAO which will give this type of weather
if we put CO2 levels to pre industrial levels or increased CO2 further.

I know you are a AGW sceptic and I am not but I had hoped you would have
agreed on the above. Otherwise when we are in a warm anti-cyclonic block in
summer I would be using that for my global warming evidence.

Although I believe man made AGW is a fact I don't believe this is the whole
story as there are natural effects in paly also. What has been noticed is
that there seems to be less of the mobile setups we used to have. This could
be due to long period of weaker solar activity or an effect of AGW however
AGW was also real in the 90s and the setup seemed very mobile in the winter
months then and the sun was in a very active phase. This lack of mobility
means that we seem to get stuck in one set of weather for a longer period of
time. Which raises the conflict prediction of an increase in chances of
drought but also the increased chance of extreme wet and also hot and cold.

Stan