On Friday, 29 March 2013 09:44:45 UTC, Adam Lea wrote:
On 29/03/13 08:57, Stan wrote:





"Lawrence13" wrote in message

...



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/el...ied-about.html





Fraser laser Nelson



Very good article that puts into perspective the naive tripe about the

austere measures needed in cutting C02.



Okay if Co2 is such a powerful greenhouse gas then reducing it is going

to cool the planet according to the AGW theory. However, if apparently

our current levels of C02 are causing severe winter misery then carbon

taxes are going to add insult to injury with not only producing a far

colder world as its taken from the atmosphere but making it f*&king

miserable in the process of doing so with economic poverty in a global

system already ready to keel over with debt.



It's a lose lose situation.



================================================== ==========================



Lawrence,



You are better than this.



No he isn't.





I know you are a AGW sceptic



Calling Lawrence a skeptic is an insult to genuine skeptics.

You see Adam I represent no one just me and what I see as right wrong or neutral.
Unfortunately for in your case, you represent the insurance industry and we all *know* how they strive, no effort too great, to keep premiums down.
The AGW bandwagon has been a boon for them.