On Mar 28, 5:30*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Mar 28, 4:53*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

What are the chances of a severe quake around 55°S,20°W?
Both the Met Office and the BOM chart indicate three largish quakes on
Sunday or thereabouts.
There are three Lows on the Canadian EFS but they don’t hang around
long, nor build into anything significant –but that may mean it is
going to be a fair bit more than 80 degrees away from North America

One is getting a little impatient with these stalling patterns.
It looks like more snow after this coming little Australian spat.
I wish I knew how to do a search for a large mag in that area of the
South Atlantic (South Sandwich Islands region.)

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...ic/results.php

Comcat Search Beta - Results
DATE_TIME * * * * * * * * * LAT * * *LON * * * * *DEP * MAG

2008-06-30 *06:17 * * * -58.2S. * * * * *-22.0 *7.0
1977-08-26 *19:50 * * * -59.4S. * * * * *-20.5 *7.1

I think this is only half the region. I bleieve it has only looked
south of the region. The older server set up was a lot easier to
understand.

And anyway I don't have charts going back to then, it IS unlikely we
had all that much snow for those dates though. I am pretty sure I
would have remembered.

Looks like another bust. Yet it has to occur that there is a large mag
in the system, just not a clearly forecastable one.

Pity.
New spell soon.
Similar but different:
Mar 27 09:27 Apr 3 04:37
A broken spell from Midnight Monday (April 1st) but don't be fooled.
4:40 is a close anticyclone spell but then so is a thundery spell.
You get lots of Lows and Highs on the scale found on most of the
charts I use in a thunder spell:
forecast for: 2013-04-02 at:
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensem.../cartes_e.html
An anticyclone spell won't have so many but it is on the half our so
it will look like it had been thrown in the fire.

We'll see.