On Sunday, 21 April 2013 15:57:39 UTC+1, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-04-21 14:30:01 +0000, Lawrence13 said:



On Sunday, 21 April 2013 14:54:39 UTC+1, aka sutart-thingy yttiw wrote:





I think that is a very wise approach.







Especially as there are lots of people who stand to make billions

from us continuing to burn vast amounts of fossil fuels.



Yes the *******s force it on you don't they. You know I bet every time

you take one of your cars to a petrol station some bugger fills it up

despite you kicking and screaming "No, no please don't do that because

we are all going to die." and you cry all the way back home to your

house the one without solar panels.



Hmmmm.



One of my cars? How many do you think I have?



Or are you just fishing for info so that you can deduce what kind of

tactics are needed to humiliate my kind of person?

At least you seem to have given up your wonderful idea that I am

Dawlish posting under another name. Are your guesses always that wide

of the mark?



As for solar panels, I was all for them but when the man came around to

give me a quote he said that because the house faced south-east, and

the house next door is slightly set back from the line of mine, the

roof was not ideally situated for an installation that would pay for

itself.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I see you've used my witty suggestion yttiw.