On May 10, 4:53*pm, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-10 14:15:42 +0000, Weatherlawyer said:





On May 10, 9:32*am, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-09 15:12:17 +0000, Weatherlawyer said:

Or does anyone else seeing a reply by Dawlish get a mild depression?
Oh for a nice healthy drought.

No, not petty - just childish and boring as usual.

I pretty well agree witha ll the above sentiment but his name just has
the effect of my not wishing to open a thread.
It's OK when someone else's name repaces his unless Dawlish started
the thread and then I just close the link. But what is it in a name
that has such an affect on a person who will never really be troubled
by it?

Maybe I aught to get back on my meds.

But you started this thread, and I assume that you wanted others to
back you up.

Some folk might get depressed reading long posts which link seismic
activity to the position of low pressure areas over German Bight, but
presumably they don't let that wind them up to such an extent that they
become obsessed with insulting one particular poster.

I have no idea if variations in atmospheric pressure can influence the
occurrence of earthquakes, or vice versa, but it would be a fascinating
discovery if proved correct.

What does intrigue me, is that in videos of many volcanic eruptions
lightning can be seen in the ash plume

What on earth are you doing reading my work?
Have you absolutley no sense at all?

Good grief. It's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a usenet post
with someone who doesn't believe what I tell him but doesn't stop
reading more of what I have to say that I really wish I'd listened to
what my mother told me when I was young.