On May 11, 6:52*pm, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-11 12:39:04 +0000, Buchan Meteo said:

Weatherlawyer scrive:

What on earth are you doing reading my work? Have you absolutley no
sense at all?

Good grief. It's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a usenet post
with someone who doesn't believe what I tell him but doesn't stop
reading more of what I have to say that I really wish I'd listened to
what my mother told me when I was young.

What was that? Not to take sweets from strange men? That was what mine
said.

No, I imagine it was more along the lines of "don't do that dear, it
will make you go blind"

Well we will never know now as she is too dead for me to ask her.
I do have to use glasses but I am not blind. Tell me (since you are so
easily impressed with really stupid ideas about masturbation and such
fairy tales) why are some probablistic reactions to compact isobars
only likely to produce storms in the air?

Or do you suppose (along with the experts at NCAR and whoever the
other dolts are who wrote that crap about the atmosphere in the
Encyclopeadia Britannica) that weather causes weather?