On May 10, 4:53*pm, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-10 14:15:42 +0000, Weatherlawyer said:





On May 10, 9:32*am, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-09 15:12:17 +0000, Weatherlawyer said:

Or does anyone else seeing a reply by Dawlish get a mild depression?
Oh for a nice healthy drought.

No, not petty - just childish and boring as usual.

I pretty well agree witha ll the above sentiment but his name just has
the effect of my not wishing to open a thread.
It's OK when someone else's name repaces his unless Dawlish started
the thread and then I just close the link. But what is it in a name
that has such an affect on a person who will never really be troubled
by it?

Maybe I aught to get back on my meds.

But you started this thread, and I assume that you wanted others to
back you up.

Some folk might get depressed reading long posts which link seismic
activity to the position of low pressure areas over German Bight, but
presumably they don't let that wind them up to such an extent that they
become obsessed with insulting one particular poster.

I have no idea if variations in atmospheric pressure can influence the
occurrence of earthquakes, or vice versa, but it would be a fascinating
discovery if proved correct.

Following revelations recently about upper atmosphere soundings being
50% or more bull****, I am surprised that I am the only one in the
world who sees compression of isobars at sea level as the firt major
sign of seismic activity.

I also fail to understand that once I point out the defects in model
runs is almost entirely due to seismicity anyone interested in
attempting to perfect computer analysis aka LF Richardson wopuld
perversely maintian ignorance of my suggestions.

Be that as it may it is a good thing FOR seismology that Meteorologist
can maintain such a high level of ignorance. In Japan the government
in its wisdom has combined the seismic and meteorologic agencies. But
I can't speak to them as I am unable to translate my work.

The Chinese combine the sudy of animal behaviour with seismology and
get good results for a great deal less than the japanese do, oddly
enough the Japanese have never succeeded in making a forecast. Someone
there should learn to read Chinese.

In Britain the government combined Meteorology with Climatology (which
is rather like combinign chalk and cheese and attempting to get gold
out of it. You would think that the scions of one of the greatest
scientific endeavours since Nebuchadnezzar set up a think tank of
Jewish Scientists would have accomplished more that that idiocy with
agencies like the Royal Society, etcetera, etcetera, wouldn't you?

What does intrigue me, is that in videos of many volcanic eruptions
lightning can be seen in the ash plume.

Considering the ability of electricity to void clouds, you wouldn't
imagine that aerosols could last for years in the atmosphere would
you?

What do you make of the idea that earthquakes can occur deeper than 5
miles underground?
Impossible, no?