Thread: "Climate bomb"
View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old June 28th 13, 10:32 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
Martin Brown Martin Brown is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 935
Default "Climate bomb"

On 28/06/2013 01:14, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 08:16:56 UTC+1, Martin Brown wrote:
On 25/06/2013 09:11, Hugh Newbury wrote: http://www.eia-international.org/exp...er-next-decade The Environmental Investigation Agency is warning of a possible disaster if China bans trading of climate credits for the incineration of HFC-23, thus making it no longer financially viable to destroy the gas, which is 15,000 times more damaging to the climate than CO2. I don't want to start a war here, but what do people who know about such things think of this. It isn't really news. This carbon credits scam was identified 5 years ago and now industry is kicking back against attempts to prevent abuse. They were making more money by making the impurity and trading credits than by selling the end product refridgerant. Utter policy madness! See for example: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...l#.UclkwfnVB8E (not sure if there is a paywall in the way) Google "HFC 23 CDM UNFCCC

" and you should get a direct link and maybe a cached copy. -- Regards, Martin Brown Third time lucky? Apologies if this is an apparent repeat.

Another point about this is that HFC-23, which is nothing more than trifluoromethane or fluoroform (CHF3) is, according to my knowledge, not a substance that destroys the ozone layer though it certainly chemically resembles those that do. Its production is therefore limited by fewer protocols than a known ozone-depleter.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey


All the HFC compounds are less enduring than the ozone depleting CFCs
that they replaced and degrade somewhat more rapidly in the atmosphere.
However, this one is a very potent GHG and relatively stable.

It is a few thousands of time more effective as a GHG than CO2 and stays
around for about a half life of 300 years.

Not a good idea to be pumping it out just for the hell of it.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/news/quarte...increases.html

The carbon credits market is corrupt and corrupting and has become
nothing more than a vehicle for spivs and speculators and merchandise
free carousel fraud. Basically just what you expect from bankers.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown