On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC+1, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-08-23 13:12:48 +0000, Jim Cannon said:



As per Matt Hugos forecast



Or, more correctly - the computer forecast as interpreted by someone

called Matt Hugo.



Which anyone can do without any qualifications whatsoever, when they

see a run of forecast charts with a bloody great high pressure almost

stationary over the UK.



The secret lies with who they subsequently blame if the forecast goes

wrong - the computer or themselves? Also who they congratulate if the

forecast is correct - the computer or themselves?

I usually blame me.

PS Who's Matt Hugo? Egghead doesn't appear to like him, but that's likely to be a positive.