On Friday, 6 September 2013 12:27:09 UTC+1, Jim Cannon wrote:

Never thought we see a BBC weatherman sing the praises of someone who is so relentlessly attacked by folk on here and elsewhere.

You mean you never thought to see a BBC weatherman sing the praises of someone who relentlessly attacks the Met Office without explaining anything.

Personally I wouldn't give him time to boil an egg -which is more than the weather presenters on the BBC get. I wonder they squandered it with such irrelevance.

Is it time we gave Piers a second chance.

No.

or is it a case, for me, that absentness makes heart grow fonder?

What language is that?
I am fond of his absidity, though.

Big Jim Paul Hudson's tweet "@Hudson weather: Great long range call Piers.. Rapid (meteorological) changes 6th & 7th September. No-one can argue with that @Piers_Corbyn @ClimateRealists"

Ah right, it was on a blog. I take it he never mist this then?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...g-8799266.html

The report states drivers were travelling at high speed without headlights

It was such accidents and reports of them that made me a believer in lunarcy. Inclined me to think Piers wasn't a total waste of time. It's your attentions to hime that have made me a convert.

Accidents like that don't happen if the mist isn't very thick. And the acidentees thicker. And if the mist is any more than mist, nobody should be driving over 30 mph. They shouldn't be out in fog if it isn't an emmergency. I hope their insurance is voided. Cars don't bend like that unless hit by someone at high speed, while travelling themselves at a similarly stupid rate of knots.