On Thursday, 24 October 2013 18:38:30 UTC+1, Col wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Thursday, 24 October 2013 01:06:21 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 23:59:46 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins

wrote:











Yes: you see me as a trouble maker, don't you Adam







****ing well grow up.



You have to be one of the most childish schoolyard fighters going.



No I'm just trying to point out the hostility shown on the NG to

anyone who dares question the human portion of co2 that is apparently

trumping and driving all other climatic drivers.



It's not so much hostility towards questioning AGW in itself but the

conspiracy-based, veering on paranoid 'Reds under the bed' approach

you take. The Met Office with their 'agenda' and the twin socialist evils

of the Guardian & the BBC.

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Fair enough answer but through personal experience I know how these things work when an ideology takes over an organisation from the top downwards.


For example when the IPCC released it's 5th assessment a well known meteorologist emailed me telling me that all at Exeter had been briefed with the 'party line' as it were if approached by the press. I've also heard tales from the inside that people are scared to show a contrary position inside UKMO as indeed I saw the same thing mentioned the other day for a similar American organisation.