On Thursday, October 24, 2013 7:27:02 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 18:38:30 UTC+1, Col wrote:

Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



On Thursday, 24 October 2013 01:06:21 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 23:59:46 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins

wrote:
Yes: you see me as a trouble maker, don't you Adam















****ing well grow up.







You have to be one of the most childish schoolyard fighters going.







No I'm just trying to point out the hostility shown on the NG to



anyone who dares question the human portion of co2 that is apparently



trumping and driving all other climatic drivers.







It's not so much hostility towards questioning AGW in itself but the



conspiracy-based, veering on paranoid 'Reds under the bed' approach



you take. The Met Office with their 'agenda' and the twin socialist evils



of the Guardian & the BBC.



--



Col







Bolton, Lancashire



160m asl



Snow videos:



http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Fair enough answer but through personal experience I know how these things work when an ideology takes over an organisation from the top downwards.

Prove it. I very much doubt this happened. It is more probably that it is just your far right-wing mentality that thinks it did, because you didn't like what was happening.

For example when the IPCC released it's 5th assessment a well known meteorologist emailed me telling me that all at Exeter had been briefed with the 'party line' as it were if approached by the press.

Really. Again, prove it; don't just say it.

I've also heard tales from the inside........

No you haven't. You are now just making it up.

........ that people are scared to show a contrary position inside UKMO as indeed I saw the same thing mentioned the other day for a similar American organisation.

An utterly ridiculous post, which you will fail to substantiate and probably end up throwing your toys out of the pram when you are pressed to.