View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Old November 20th 13, 11:08 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
Dawlish Dawlish is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default **Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:56:09 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote:

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:


Dawlish wrote:








You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads




specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a




break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this




forecast can then be judged.








Obsessed?




That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies




to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.








Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself


look




silly.




--




Col








Bolton, Lancashire




160m asl




Snow videos:




http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg




It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing,


over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post,


unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually


deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when


they post idiocy.




Wouldn't it be easier just to ignore them, I don't see what you get out

of this. Plus, it also gives the impression you can't refute their

arguments,

now I know you can, so why make it look like you can't?



Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll


wake up in a better mood, Col. *))




Just because I draw attention to your double-standards doesn't mean

I am in a bad mood.

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg


Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards' (apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)). Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware.

PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you would agree.