On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:16:14 PM UTC, Adam Lea wrote:
On 20/11/2013 07:17, Dawlish wrote:

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:

Dawlish wrote:







You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads



specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a



break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this



forecast can then be judged.







Obsessed?



That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies



to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.







Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look



silly.



--



Col







Bolton, Lancashire



160m asl



Snow videos:



http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg



It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again.



It may be a better idea have a set of stock rebuttals stored somewhere.

Whenever you feel the urge to reply to another idiotic post, cut and

paste with the subject line something like ***Automated xxx response***

(where xxx is the subject of the rebuttal), then cut and paste the

response, job done. That may make it easier for others to filter out

your replies as well, plus you get to challenge the same rubbish over

and over again to the point where, just maybe, it may discourage people

from posting rubbish. Just a thought.

Or I could challenge idiocy when I see it in whatever way I wish, or decide not to, as I wish. *))