On Sunday, February 9, 2014 6:01:02 PM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:
On 09/02/2014 17:23, Dawlish wrote:

On Sunday, February 9, 2014 3:18:21 PM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:

On 09/02/2014 08:09, Dawlish wrote:







Note the words "......is likely", in the first sentence. No scientist of

Julia's stature would currently link a particular event, like the UK

storms, or the cold in the USA, or any one the plethora of extreme weather

events to climate change, but all know the state of play - "there is no

evidence to counter the basic premise a warmer world will lead to more

intense daily and hourly rain events."



Now go on, denier, try do the usual denier ad hominem on the excellent,

world-renowned climate scientist who has, hopefully, provided some education

for you.



'World-renowned climate scientist' sounds wonderful, but the only people

who are aware of her existence are pretty much other climate

scientists - 99% of Brits have no idea who she is.



Or attack me - but I really don't care; all I do is to show you the actual

science. Actually, no-one cares whether you learn from it, or whether you

continue to get your science from denier blogs, or from "David" on UK..railway. *))



"all I do is to show you the actual science". I must have missed that.



Then read what I post about climate science, in response to these idiots, more accurately, dear boy.



Nope, I won't be wasting my time doing that.

Brian W Lawrence

Wantage

Oxfordshire

Then you will be the poorer, as I quote established science WRT climate science. To what source will you go that quotes you better science? I would imagine Julia Slingo is not a source you would pay any attention to, as I've already quoted her today. You surely don't feel she is a source to be ignored?

I suppose "David" from UK.railway, is a far better source, as you don't seem to have criticised that source at all. *))