On Monday, February 10, 2014 10:14:24 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 10 February 2014 21:41:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

On Monday, February 10, 2014 9:07:57 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



On Monday, 10 February 2014 06:34:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:







On Sunday, February 9, 2014 10:31:12 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:







Hundreds of thousands of climate scientist.







No; hundreds of thousands of climate scientists. Again; look up the numbers working in the field, then divide that by the number who don't think anthropogenic CO2 is a worry for the planet. I know deniers like you really hate it when you beliefs are squished into that tiny box, but you have no support in science. A ball-park calculation is he







http://watchingthedeniers.wordpress....limate-change/ *







You'd like to think there are "real scientists" out there that support your views, but it's a myth. Every scientist is a sceptic; the number who feel that CO2 is not responsible for the current warning and something else is can be fitted into a medium-sized living room.







*PS. If you were a scientist laughs you would be in the red sliver. *)) Rotten, eh?







Oh my poor, poor social climbing, wanting to be seen with the right crowd Hyacinth Gravy ....oops sorry Grav'y.







Awful to see a denier resort to insults under pressure, but this one never fails to deliver.......







Here is a list that yes needs some updating as names like Murry Salby and Roy Spencer don't seem to be there and here's a list of climate scientist who are opposed to co2 as the sole driver of climate change







http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...global_warming







Yes; as I said, just under 50. They'd just fit in a medium sized living room. Wouldn't be much of a party though. They'd just be complaining that the hundreds of other mainstream scientists don't take them seriously - which they don't.











Now back to the first list which actually contains sceptical scientists as well.















http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_climate_scientists







All scientists are sceptical. I've already said that. I don't understand why you can't understand that fact. However, the vast majority are not climate deniers. Many of the 50 in your first list would certainly not class themselves as that, which increases the space between them in the medium-sized living room.







Now listen very carefully Hyacinth I'm going to ask you to count that first list, deduct the sceptics and then find me the remaining 99940. if you would be so kind.....ta.







All you have to do is a few sums. Hard, I know, but use wiki as a start for your research. There are a huge number of scientists working in climate science who have published. 100,000 may be an underestimate, or it may be an overestimate. Of those, *less than 50* have declared that they do not support the view, for various reasons (and they don't agree with each other's reasons) that CO2 is causing the current warming. This would leave you in a room with well under 0.2% of all published climate scientists. Horrible when your views are marginalised like that, isn't it? I make no apology for doing so, however; you need to know.







A visit to Tescos would allow you to buy enough cheap wine for the party in the medium-sized living room, for a modest outlay. The arguments amongst the partygoers would be hilarious to listen to, as they just can't agree on what the alternative to CO2 is.







PS Isn't it amazing how deniers, the end, *always* resort to what larry is doing when under pressure. The thread has attracted a few outright butters to cross-post, but no-one takes any notice of them, fortunately and they'll disappear again, soon. No science, just a string of foulness. The idiotic and utterly feeble physical threats usually come later. *))



Now dear Hyacinth you do get catty very quickly...cheap wine medium sized living room......meow....



Now getting back to the gist of this exchange: You claimed there are hundreds of thousands of climate scientist who say AGW is irrefutable. So far you've named none. Now try and find me some more which shouldn't be hard and I mean climate scientist not some b tech study in the increasingly early spawning season of SE London frogs.

Irrefutable? I bet you can't find where I said that, but climate deniers lie all the time and that's another for the pile. Read what I say in my posts and it will help you to learn (or it won't; no-one really cares).

Find them for yourself, larry. Then realise how small is the minority that you feel are scientists we should believe, even though the enormous majority of their peers feel they are simply wrong. You may like to read about how not a single scientific institution *on earth* has dissented from the same view (but you probably won't read, as your mind is closed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienti...climate_change

You are in a tiny minority, yet you think you are right. Why?