View Single Post
  #58   Report Post  
Old February 11th 14, 10:58 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
matt_sykes matt_sykes is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2007
Posts: 364
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 18:27:34 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, February 9, 2014 3:38:57 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 08:46:13 UTC, Dawlish wrote:




On Sunday, February 9, 2014 8:21:33 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:








In article ,
















Lawrence Jenkins writes
















On Sunday, 9 February 2014 01:14:47 UTC, Adam Lea wrote:
















































Someone talking ******** on Usenet, what a surprise - NOT.
































Adam we are entering a massive cooling phase-come to terms with it..
































Lawrence, that is as much nonsense as the article Joe posted here. It's
















time you came to terms with the fact that we are NOT "entering a massive
















cooling phase". If so, why was 2013 the 6th warmest year since records
















began in 1880?
































--
















Malcolm
















And why the last decade was easily the warmest on record and why the two warmest years on record both fell into that decade and why current global temperatures are close to record values, despite ENSO neutral conditions and the PDO being negative and.........etc. etc. etc.
















However, a climate denier like larry is capable of convincing himself of anything. "A massive colloid period" is coming. On current evidence, that's just laughable - but then again, so are larry's views on climate change.












Warmest in our records . We do know this however








In such a tiny space of time the last 2000 years saw without any argument a very warm periods where grapes were grown , Greenland was farmed and then the LIA . We know temperatures fluctuated by a couple of degrees without any influence from human co2. We also know from the ice core samples that this current inter glacial is not only one of the coolest but well overdue to end.








We also know that the global human condition up until about 200 years ago was wretched with low life expectancy and abject misery for most thirty odd years that we lived. I look at the past misery before harnessing fossil fuels on a vast scale, I look at the ice core temperature cores for the last 600 thousand years and I say hallelujah. Without energy harnessed from fossil fuels live would hardly be worth living.




The ridiculous; "tiny space of time" denier crock. Just hilarious.


You are an idiot if you think the patchy and inaccurate record going back a mere 100 years is sufficient when compared to ice core data that gives a picture going back thousands of years. Put the present warming into that picture and you will see that it is insignificant.






Why does every single National science academy on earth feel that the present period shows anomalous warming and that the warming has very little to do with the last 2000 years.


Prove it. Quote just one national science body that says todays temperatures are anomalous in the entire temperature record.