View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Old February 11th 14, 02:03 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Dawlish Dawlish is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default Earth's global average temp more or less steady since 2001

On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:42:48 AM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:
On 10/02/2014 19:34, Malcolm wrote:



In article , Brian Lawrence


writes




"Despite ongoing increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases, the


Earth's global average surface air temperature has remained more or


less steady since 2001."




"http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2106.


html"




So what?




A scientist would know that the first sentence of an abstract of a


scientific paper , such as you have quoted above, conventionally sets


out the problem being investigated.




An honest scientist would quote the conclusion of the abstract which is:




"The net effect of these anomalous winds is a cooling in the 2012 global


average surface air temperature of 0.1-0.2 °C, which can account for


much of the hiatus in surface warming observed since 2001. This hiatus


could persist for much of the present decade if the trade wind trends


continue, however rapid warming is expected to resume once the anomalous


wind trends abate."




Readers can draw their own conclusions about you, your honesty, and


about the conclusions of the paper.




Indeed. I made a post which contained no words of my own and provided a

link to more info. I thought such actions were one of the main purposes

of a Newsgroup, even though as a long-time lurker I am aware of the

knee jerk reactions and rabid responses that often ensue.



C'est la vie.



--



Brian W Lawrence

Wantage

Oxfordshire


Yes, the rabid responses I and others, who propose and link to mainstream science to show that it is likely to be correct about climate change, receive from climate deniers are legendary in the newsgroup and utterly foul. I don't think you have been subject to anything of that ilk, ever, have you?