On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:51:43 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 21:16:37 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:49:49 PM UTC, Adam Lea wrote:







Well said, however I would exercise caution in any claims that the







current flooding is related to climate change before any attribution







study has been conducted. Otherwise, it is no different to claiming that







the run of cold winters in the UK prior to this year demonstrates a







cooling trend.







snipped for clarity







Me too and as would any scientist. However, sensibly, no scientist has claimed that the current UK flooding *is* due to climate change.







Someone called "David" on a railway newsgroup has said that "someone" has said this and one of the group's deniers decided to set up a straw man by copying his totally anonymous (and incorrect, if it is directed at a scientist) claim on here.







You can bet your boots that one of the group's deniers will say, at some time soon, that "scientists have said............." - probably because they read this straw man thread and believed it. shakes head. It's how they work.



Instead of criticising those that are fed up with the MSM.......

You need to be reminded of why your views are ignored. That's what I and others do. The chances of what you want to happen, happening, are extremely low. You can be as "fed up" as you wish, but it doesn't change the facts, or the fact that climate deniers are ignored by scientists.

..........the AGW blogosphere and the Whitehouse blaming heat on AGW, then blaming cold on AGW, maybe you should vent your spleen on the people that exaggerate and paint pictures of global catastrophe.

No, we've got idiots like you to make fools of themselves doing that. *))

You know people like your mate 'Old Man in a Cave' who actually said four years ago in his blog that you ingratiated yourself; that the arctic would be ice free before 2013!!!!

Another lie. Bet you can't source that comment from Fergus. He's also a blogger, not a scientist and just doesn't count. He reflects the mainstream view - which is not the lie that you've just written about him.


But of course you will fail or better still avoid the response as it shows you up for the prat that you are.

Seems you were wrong. You lied. Source your quote. Bet you can't.

Let's face it I'm still waiting for a couple of scientists names from that remaining 99,960 of hundreds of thousands of AGW scientist.

Like I said, find them yourself. there are enough to go on. No-one bothers to compile lists of scientists whose work supports CO2 being likely to be the main cause of GW, as they would go on for so long. It's everyone, except for a ragbag group of left-field scientists who simply don't agree with each other about alternatives. Start with the MetO and work wikiwards. It's easy. *))


I'll dig out the bet you offered on the arctic being ice free about 5 years ago.

Good luck on digging that out. It's another lie, of course. Deniers lie constantly to aggrandise their position. Thats two clear ones in one post. Where do you go next?