On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:17:00 PM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:
On 12/02/2014 09:28, matt_sykes wrote:



That famous '97% of all scientists' study only questioned 10000, and of those

only 40% agreed to the two questions, which themselves only asked if mans role

was 'significant' and not 'dominant'. Significant at a statistical level means

measurable, or relevant, so could be 5% say.



They took this 10000 and whittled it down to 79 to get their 97%. So thats it.

76 scientists, 2 of whoom thought it hadnt warmed since 1900, the other of the

two questions.



Garvey is a childish fool. Hundreds of thousands indeed, its utter garbage..



You might think that, I couldn't possibly comment :-)



--



Brian W Lawrence

Wantage

Oxfordshire

You'd like to though. The person you are replying to is a cross-posting troll. The only reason he posts here is because he can't stand me deciding not to post somewhere else - because he and the other deniers there are stupid and simply not worth it. I don't reply to him on here. I think you might fit in well, on Alt.global-warming Brian, but I couldn't possibly say outright. *))