On Wednesday, 12 February 2014 14:38:30 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:17:00 PM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:

On 12/02/2014 09:28, matt_sykes wrote:







That famous '97% of all scientists' study only questioned 10000, and of those



only 40% agreed to the two questions, which themselves only asked if mans role



was 'significant' and not 'dominant'. Significant at a statistical level means



measurable, or relevant, so could be 5% say.







They took this 10000 and whittled it down to 79 to get their 97%. So thats it.



76 scientists, 2 of whoom thought it hadnt warmed since 1900, the other of the



two questions.







Garvey is a childish fool. Hundreds of thousands indeed, its utter garbage..







You might think that, I couldn't possibly comment :-)







--







Brian W Lawrence



Wantage



Oxfordshire



You'd like to though. The person you are replying to is a cross-posting troll. The only reason he posts here is because he can't stand me deciding not to post somewhere else - because he and the other deniers there are stupid and simply not worth it. I don't reply to him on here. I think you might fit in well, on Alt.global-warming Brian, but I couldn't possibly say outright. *))

You mean I drove you out of alt.global-warming by calling you on your BS and I intend to do it here aswell.