Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 08:39:44 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:09:43 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:27:01 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 14:24:58 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 2:15:02 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
And they get a free pass with the AGW tripe yet certain members jump on the sceptics calling foul OT for those who hold a different point of view.
And the lies you use to try to back your position larry? You seem to have missed those.
You lied about Fergus, trying to say he said something that he didn't and you lied about me, trying to say I said something I didn't either. I'd like an apology. It's what people do when they are caught lying.
I have never ever used lies
Apart from the fact that you lied for effect, twice in one thread, I'm sure you don't lie, really.
You lied about Fergus - he never said the Arctic would be ice free by 2013. Look back in the thread and actually read what Fergus said. I'll repeat it again for you, as you won't bother:
"He said, rightly, that if El Nino continued, there could be **a chance** of it happening. There wasn't and it wasn't ice free. Geddit larry? (Probably not)." Were you too stupid to understand this?
Deniers lie for effect. You people always lie, when it comes to climate change denial, as the truth shows you up as bereft.
Now source your second lie - that I apparently offered a bet that the Arctic would be ice-free within 5 years. Bet you can't - as I've already said, because you lied for effect *again* larry.
Do you honestly think anyone believes you here? An apology for lying about the two of us would help.
You are doing your usual job of trying to hide when the going gets difficult.
Why did you lie about Fergus when he clearly didn't predict the Arctic would be ice-free in 2013 and why did you lie about me offering some kind of a bet that the Arctic would be ice-free in 5 years (a bet that, had I offered, I would have immediately taken up!!
You lie for effect larry. Why?
Old AGW Fanatic in a Cave made a prediction based on several ifs of which he was confident would happen. He made a ludicrous prediction based on that and he got it totally wrong why can't you just accept that?
By the way is Fergus one of your hundred thousand climate scientist?
|