Why the storms can NOT be due to CO2. And why GW is NOT a problem.
On Monday, 17 February 2014 14:32:49 UTC+1, Malcolm wrote:
load of BS
Storms do create flood plains. Where else does rain come from? Non storms?
A 'process of study' is still not gong to create a flood plain, unless you really do think that a load of scholars standing around river banks is enough to tramp the ground flat? Or perhaps you want to retract and say flood plains are not formed by geomorphology? Hmm?
Oh, and WV is mote important than CO2. Way more important. If you don't know that its time you did some basic reading up on GH gasses.
Oh, and as for 'spouting' all I did was describe the basics of AGW theory. If you are calling that a load of 'spout' I might agree with you.
But look, once again Malcom, instead of avoiding the subject, why don't you just admit that WV is not a positive feedback as predicted and that therefore the most we will get from 100% more CO2 is 1.2C? Can you do that? Can you be a man and admit the science? Or are you gong to pansy around spouting off ancient greek and other diversionary tactics?
|