On Monday, 17 February 2014 16:32:38 UTC+1, Malcolm wrote:
In article ,

matt_sykes writes

On Monday, 17 February 2014 14:32:49 UTC+1, Malcolm wrote:

load of BS



Storms do create flood plains. Where else does rain come from? Non storms?



Storms create floods. What possible mechanism do you imagine is involved

for a storm to create an area of low-lying land

Who said it has to be low lying. Ever hear of Boscastle?



into which a river can

overflow at times of excess water flow? Is it the weight of water

flattening the land the river flows through?





A 'process of study' is still not gong to create a flood plain, unless

you really do think that a load of scholars standing around river banks

is enough to tramp the ground flat? Or perhaps you want to retract

and say flood plains are not formed by geomorphology? Hmm?



Read what I wrote about proceesses.



Oh, and WV is mote important than CO2. Way more important. If you

don't know that its time you did some basic reading up on GH gasses.



Water vapour is an important greenhouse effect, it is NOT about climate

change. It cannot on its own change the climatre.


I didn't say it did, I said it was proposed as a positive feedback to CO2 caused warming. Are you having trouble reading or do you want me to spell it out for you in simpler terms?







Oh, and as for 'spouting' all I did was describe the basics of AGW

theory. If you are calling that a load of 'spout' I might agree with

you.



No, I would call it a load of BS!





But look, once again Malcom, instead of avoiding the subject, why don't

you just admit that WV is not a positive feedback as predicted and that

therefore the most we will get from 100% more CO2 is 1.2C? Can you do

that? Can you be a man and admit the science? Or are you gong to

pansy around spouting off ancient greek and other diversionary tactics?



I disagree. Water vapour is a feedback effect and your contention that

the most we will get from 100% more CO2 is 1.2C is non-credible

nonsense.


I see, so if WV is a positive feedback, ie, it increases as it gets warmer, then the NASA WV project shows it has cooled since 1988? Is that what you are saying Malcom?


Of course not. It has got warmer, and WV has reduced, which means your BS little theory about AGW is dead in the water.


Face facts Malcom, WV hasn't increased, or is NASA wrong and Malcom right?