View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old March 21st 14, 07:14 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Dawlish Dawlish is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default **Forecast: Retrogression leading to cooler than averagetemperatures on 20th March at T+240**

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 9:38:55 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:51:24 PM UTC, Freddie wrote:

I said that the models showed that the *anticyclone* would retrogress, which is exactly what has happened.








No, it hasn't.








Yes it has. The anticyclone, which moved as far East as to be centred to our east,




then moved SW and is now centred in the mid Atlantic, south of the




Azores.




Erm that's not what happened.






Yes it was.



The high pressure, which was centred to our east before the weekend








No it wasn't - it was directly over us.








Yes it was. Look back over the charts and you'll see that the most easterly




point of its progressive journey left its centre to our east. Look




back at the charts.




I did look back over the charts - but only to double-check before I made my




assertions, as I follow them in real time too.






You have not looked carefully enough and I look at them on every run that I can.









pulled back through the weekend and early this week








No it didn't. The original high decayed from the north, allowing a








westerly flow to sink south over the UK. A new anticyclone moving from








west to east was in mid atlantic at the start of the week.












Pressure fell from the North, giving the appearance of a "decay"




(not sure exactly what you mean by that, word, Freddie) as the




high pulled back SW. After a brief incursion. the high




re-built and then clearly regressed SW again.




That's exactly how highs decay - by pressure falling.




Not from a limb!!









to sit where it currently is in the mid Atlantic








There isn't currently a high in mid Atlantic. There is a broad trough.








apologies from me. There is at our latitude. I was not specific




enough. Look to the south of the trough in mid-Atlantic. What




do you see?




That high is pretty much always there - it has been for the period




of the changes since you issued your forecast.






the high extended over us from the Azores settled over s, then to our east, then retrogressed, Freddie.



allowing the incursion of cooler, Atlantic air








This occurred when the westerly flow was sinking south over the UK at








the weekend.








We've had 20C in London on Monday and a 15C max every day in




some part of the UK. That is clearly not an incursion of




cold Atlantic air. I don't think we've had any hill snow




in that time - but we will have tomorrow and perhaps later




today.




I didn't say cooler - just a westerly flow, to differentiate our weather




from that of high pressure.




In that case, I accept that you did not say cooler.



and the change to a more progressive pattern, from a blocked pattern;








This occurred when the original block was eroded from the north by








strong cross-Atlantic westerlies - last weekend.








Yes. That's why I said that this retrogression began




"at the weekend", but, by today, it hasn't led




to the incursion of cold Atlantic air that the




charts suggested would have happened, 10 days




ago. Although pressure has fallen, winds are




between south-west and west, rather veering more




NW, as the charts suggested would have happened




by today.




But it wasn't a retrogression. It was a replacement




of high pressure with a westerly flow by a




non-retrogressive method.








I'm open to learning here




Good.




But, on the other hand, you appear not to be. It would help if you would look back more carefully at the charts for that period and provide some learning, if you can, instead of making simple assertions.



Freddie






http://twitter.com/PulverbatchWx for hourly reports


You've gone very quiet Freddie. Still waiting for some evidence that what you've said happened is what actually happened.