On Saturday, March 22, 2014 11:35:56 AM UTC, Freddie wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 02:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish

wrote:

I have never said that this wasn't the case.

Now Freddie, you only have to scroll back:

The high pressure, which was centred to our east before the

weekend

On the 11th yes.......

Thank you for finally admitting this.

.............- but not on the 13th and 14th which is what I

thought you meant by "before the weekend". Difference in

interpretation.

That's a little weak, if I may say. The only "interpretation" was yours, Freddie. Yes; you "thought" you'd read something that I'd written and commented that the high never moved to our east, from memory. What actually happened was that you made a mistake with your remembrance of those charts and then spent several posts trying to say you'd tried to say you'd never said anything of the sort, until you, yourself, sourced Bernard's archive, which clearly showed you'd remembered wrongly.

Now that high moving to our east is settled (it did) we are left with whether it retrogressed from there. The archive charts between 12th and 16th March show that it did. If you don't feel that is the case, please produce some evidence to the contrary. My evidence for retrogression is he

http://www.woksat.info/wwp7.html

The high moved from our east to our SW between 12th March and 16th March. The charts clearly show that. I maintain there was no replacement of that high and it was not eroded from the north. It retrogressed - just as the models showed it would on the 10th when I made the forecast in the OP.