On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:34:13 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:21:37 PM UTC, Freddie wrote:


Snip. I read what you said here more carefully..........

This left us with high (e) which persisted around

47-49N 15-20W until the 17th when it moved SW to around 41N19W before

Hang on! You are now saying that the high moved SW - exactly what I've been saying. That is movement against the main pattern of flow, isn't it? The definition of that is.....................?

dispersing by the 20th.

So no retrogression - just a single instance of a high moving into the

continent (a), with a new high (e) forming 1500 miles to the west. That

isn't retrogression. And, as I've said a few times before, the upper

pattern isn't conducive to retrogression.

Yes, that's your assertion. I could say the moon was made of green cheese, but it wouldn't be true without me providing evidence.


Freddie