I have pointed out in my earlier commentary that there was one high

centre (e) in that time period (that formed around 49N18W around midday

on the 14th) and that wandered around a small area 47-49N 15-20W before


Nowhere in that

commentary did I suggest that the high over the UK (which actually had

moved east into the North sea and dispersed during the 13th) moved in a

southwesterly direction.

You keep talking about this, but you are providing no evidence that
retrogression did not occur.
My commentary is my evidence. I notice that you don't provide a
commentary - you just expect me to accept what you say.

If you could provide a link you would.

I did provide a link - google "Rossby waves". You will be presented

with a plethora of resources that you can consume at your leisure.

Apologies for the slow reply to your post - I had spotted your earlier

reply (at 20:05 on Monday) and assumed you were lost for words. Hence I

didn't pick up on this post till this morning.

Freddie

That is not the link to the upper air charts which you have said
would support your assertion.
Apologies. I thought you were asking for a link to the theory of Rossby
waves. I will find a link to upper air charts this evening.

you learn better from your mistakes
If you can admit to making them in the first place.


You are surely not saying that a "link" to google "Rossby waves"
would tell us all about the retrogression on 16-19 March
No -the link would show you that retrogression didn't occur.

It is clear that you have no link to upper air data to
back your assertions
I will supply this.

No-one else has even attempted to provide evidence that
my statement is wrong.

That hasn't escaped my attention either. Maybe others are waiting for
me to present my evidence first?

--
Freddie
Castle Pulverbatch
Shropshire
221m AMSL
http://www.hosiene.co.uk/weather/
http://twitter.com/PulverbatchWx for hourly reports