On Monday, 24 November 2014 13:54:02 UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Monday, 24 November 2014 12:20:01 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
Blimey ecmwf and gfs couldn't be any more different than they are currently
GFS 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1681.gif stiff westerly

ECMWF 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm1681.gif stiff easterly

And just to make your head spin even more - how about the currently available different resolutions of the GFS model...

http://expert-images.weatheronline.c...20406_2406.gif
http://expert-images.weatheronline.c...20406_2406.gif

Aw....... I do like that second one. December the fourth looks very enticing