On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:36:20 -0000, Philip Eden wrote:

PS I would normally just have added this to the earlier thread, but
I get the impression that many people simply don't see things which
are posted to threads more than 48 hours old (not that I'm implying
that this is "mustn't miss" material) ... is this a fair assumption?

It shouldn't be, I see new postings to threads were the previous
posting was weeks ago. But there is no accounting for broken
newsreaders or servers...

--
Cheers
Dave. pam is missing e-mail