On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 9:30:09 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 19:23:36 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 7:07:11 PM UTC, Dave Ludlow wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:57:51 -0800 (PST), Dawlish
wrote:

On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 5:41:28 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Just shows how good weather forecasting is these days:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-30996010

I should have added: if it comes off. *))

It did come off, the actual forecasts yesterday (not the media
misinterpretaions) was for up to a foot of snow in parts of NYC (they
definitely had that at Queens, there was a live HD webcam - even more
on Long Island) and 2 feet further NE, peaking at 3 feet in a few
places. We can't judge NYC from the Times Square webcam, they were
snow clearing all night there.

They are already up to 2 feet in Boston and 30 inches in several other
cities in the vicinity. Great forecast... though the southern edge of
the heaviest snow was *very slightly* further NE than forecast. Boston
is currently -9 deg C and feels like a bone-chilling -18C in the wind.
We've *never* seen the like of that combination in a major UK city,
IIRC.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/201...AbI/story.html

--
Dave
Fareham

Thanks Dave. I was really criticising myself for saying a forecast was good, before outcome - which was rather silly!

That's because there was a fevered push by AGW nutters to use the storm and the depth of snow to illustrate just how bad global warming had become and you didn't disappoint.

Idiot. There are deniers on alt.g-w who constantly ask the question as to how can AGW be happening when it snows so heavily? You've made another few idiotic, post midnight posts, because you have absolutely no-one else you could be talking to, larry.

Go to bed, instead. You'll be a happier person.