On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:35:31 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:11:59 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers
after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied
to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

As I have your attention, Jim, please could you ask Piers what went
wrong with this piece of his forecasting, issued on December 9th 2014:

"The massive storm (map below for 10th 12noon) now heading for Britain
and Ireland 9/10th bringing blizzard conditions for most parts and
damaging gales or storms in all parts is essentially our top active
period 5-8th extended a day or two.
"This will then develop to set up the more Northerly VERY SEVERE
SNOW AND BLIZZARD BLAST WITH EXTREME COLD AND GALES for the following
period Friday 12th to Tue 16th . This was always forecast by
WeatherAction (from 100days ahead with detail 27days ahead) to be more
extreme and severe then 5-8th and that looks like what is going to hit.
"This will probably be the most extreme 5 days of snow blizzards and
and gales in Britain and Ireland for 100 years, being more severe than
the worst events of December 2010 (which were also correctly forecast by
WeatherAction)."

Over to you, Jim Cannon.

Are you a subscriber Malcolm? If so, and you are not 100% HAPPY with
the service, you have the right to return your subscription. On the
EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take action.
At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced rate in
view of any snow disappointment.
Which is MORE than you can say for the Met Office! Every time they get
a forecast wrong we dont get tax rebates do we! The amount of times
theyve dropped a clanger I think wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

Dear Jim

I asked you a question and you did what everyone does when asked a
question they can't answer, you asked a question of me and then tried
diversionary tactics. I wasn't asking about the Met Office's forecasts,
I was asking about this particular forecast of Corbyn who repeatedly
claims how much better he is than the Met Office.

Now, would you please re-read my question and answer it. I want to know
what went wrong with that forecast posted here by you and repeating
Corbyn's very definite forecast. It didn't contain any "ifs" or "buts",
but instead clear statements of what was going to happen, including on
the very next day, which almost anyone is capable of forecasting, even
me. But not apparently Corbyn.

So, what went wrong?

--
Malcolm

Waiting........... and laughing at piers' inability to cope with this simple question