Thread: Oh the Experts
View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old April 5th 15, 04:29 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Asha Santon[_2_] Asha Santon[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2015
Posts: 451
Default Oh the Experts

On 05/04/15 16:13, wrote:
On Sunday, April 5, 2015 at 3:00:35 PM UTC+1, Asha Santon wrote:
On 05/04/15 14:41, Alastair wrote:
On Sunday, April 5, 2015 at 12:51:05 PM UTC+1, Asha Santon wrote:
On 05/04/15 12:11, Alastair wrote:
On Sunday, April 5, 2015 at 11:23:47 AM UTC+1, Verity wrote:
On 05/04/2015 07:25, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, April 5, 2015 at 1:06:13 AM UTC+1, Lawrence
Jenkins wrote:
Say they know everything, prove nothing.

That's because there is no proof in science. Idiot.


Proof is through evidence. Idiot.

Yes, that is why Dawlish thinks cold radiation does not exist. He
ignores the evidence

Evans, J., and B. Popp. "Pictet's Experiment: The Apparent
Radiation and Reflection of Cold." American Journal of Physics
53, no. 8 (1985): 737-53.
http://www2.ups.edu/faculty/jcevans/...experiment.pdf


He must be working on the theory that heat radiates while cold
sucks. If he moves his hand towards a heat source, he feels the
warmth before making contact. That, he assumes, is the heat
radiating towards him, not his hand sucking in the heat. If he
moves his hand towards a cold source, he feels the chill before
making contact. That, he assumes, is the cold sucking the heat from
his hand, not the cold radiating towards him. What he assumes means
that heat radiates towards cold whereas cold sucks.

Such a theory implies that if you place a warm and cool object
together, the warm object will always be the active partner in
changing the temperature of the cool one. So, when you place a
block of dry ice in a warm room, the fog will not drift outwards
towards the heat.

Pictet used a concave mirror to collect the radiation from a a flask
full of ice and another mirror to concentrate that radiation onto a
thermometer which cooled. What do you call the radiation passing
between the two mirrors?


I think I made it very obvious that I agree with you. That is why my
comments sought to amusingly disprove the alternative.

--
AS
http://minnies.opcop.org.uk/


Sorry, I thought you believed the alternative. Not helped by my infamy - Everyones got it infamy :-(

Cheers, Alastair.


Look on the bright side. At least you're not paranoid. They really are
out to get you.
I'll just sit here and quietly fade away and radiate.

--
AS
http://minnies.opcop.org.uk/