On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 12:52:12 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 13 April 2015 22:29:11 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
The trouble is that you can't and you try to impose your far right wing, crappy and foul views at every possible opportunity in your posts. When you do, expect challenge. Then expect to have to deal with the challenge - or don't dobit and stick to just talking about the weather.
Geddit? Just the weather.
I'm sorry. I thought /you/ were the champion of the "Anyone can post
whatever they want. That's the beauty of newsgroups" school.
Or is that anyone that passes the Dullish mark of approval can post
whatever they want....
So what is it going to be, Dullish? People can post whatever they want
or people should stay on-topic? (People can post whatever they want as
long as Dullish is in agreement is not an option).
--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.
Yes, that was his view a few months ago in apparent defence of Joe Egg's irritating sociopolitical rants which we were all getting fed up with.. He (Dawlish) made the valid point that it was within the rules. But the inappropriateness of Joe's rants could be temporarily shoved aside for the purpose of annoying certain people (mainly me). That's Dawlish for you, a hypocrite of the first order but alas for him a stupidly transparent one.
Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.
The 'We" again. laughing Anything to try to get at me, hughes, as I've said before. Absolutely anything, including imagining you are some kind of group moderator- but it never works does it?
Dragging you back, again, to my point. The term 'methers' is as foul as, say; 'paki' (the racist you mentions term) to the people who feel the discrimination: isn't it? And larry was wrong to use such a cowardly and discriminatory term to describe some people he's never met and will never know.