On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 2:30:42 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
'methers' *It was a highly discriminatory statement from larry, with which you've agreed. wasn't it?*
I certainly wouldn't agree with it. Derogatory, yes, but highly
discriminatory? No, not even close.
Your opinion.
If you describe 'Methers' as being 'highly discriminatory', how would
you describe the N* word?
Highly discriminatory. They are both appalling to the receiver.
It's like the word pedophile,
No it is not, no matter how you feel about it.
which thanks to the Judicial system,
politicians and the press, now encompasses post-pubescent children
within its range of victims, thus mitigating the seriousness of the true
pre-pubescent pedophile. Social stupidity on a grand scale.
Rubbish and your opinion again.
Highly discriminatory? Only because it suits your agenda of the moment.
Methers would be quite low on any list of pc-incorrect words, no matter
what the criteria.
Try being one of the people in larry's park. You'd deserve all you got if you called any of them by that term. You have absolutely no idea of their problems, or addictions, if indeed they have any. Neither does larry, but like him, you are prepared to tar people you don't know with whatever brush comes to hand.
Vile, really.
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.