On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 14:49:25 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 2:30:42 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
'methers' *It was a highly discriminatory statement from larry, with which you've agreed. wasn't it?*
I certainly wouldn't agree with it. Derogatory, yes, but highly
discriminatory? No, not even close.
Your opinion.
If you describe 'Methers' as being 'highly discriminatory', how would
you describe the N* word?
Highly discriminatory. They are both appalling to the receiver.
It's like the word pedophile,
No it is not, no matter how you feel about it.
which thanks to the Judicial system,
politicians and the press, now encompasses post-pubescent children
within its range of victims, thus mitigating the seriousness of the true
pre-pubescent pedophile. Social stupidity on a grand scale.
Rubbish and your opinion again.
Highly discriminatory? Only because it suits your agenda of the moment.
Methers would be quite low on any list of pc-incorrect words, no matter
what the criteria.
Try being one of the people in larry's park. You'd deserve all you got if you called any of them by that term. You have absolutely no idea of their problems, or addictions, if indeed they have any. Neither does larry, but like him, you are prepared to tar people you don't know with whatever brush comes to hand.
Vile, really.
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.
The early dusk December/November evening I walked through the park and saw the mess they left I did call them that to their faces. I called '**** artists who take benefits and people like me who never dump their rubbish have to work and pay taxes to keep people like them in booze. People need to be told what they are sometimes especially by those that fund them. Lets face laughing boy you never hesitate to tell people they are 'idiots', do you. Difference is I will do it face to face- unlike you.
I would also say that I derived no enjoyment from having to spell out some home truths to this particular group and do you know what they were as nice as pie with me when I saw them again , clearing up their rubbish, a small price to pay for being s a state funded drunk.
As I drive to work every day and through the streets of SE London, Croydon, Sutton and Hackbridge I constantly see working people as well, let alone those on state benefits dump their 'Morley's chicken', 'McDonalds' and other junk willy nilly on the streets, Mitcham common and practically anywhere I walk or drive.
These people need to be publicly called the anti social pigs that they are and shamed. In the case of those that don't work and give nothing back to system , its the least they can do. I have a sister with two adult daughters who have never worked out of choice. They are not at the 'dosser' stage but they have never worked. But what a strange world where to state a fact of truth is seen to be a righ-wing lie
Now with you Garvey you have fled to a affluent part of the country to escape such things. There is nothing stopping your left charitable yearnings and go and live say in Thornton Heath, no one is stopping you. At least Piers who lives in Camberwell/Walworth puts his money you know where.
But once again I ask you: what do you call someone who drinks meths?
So far I've asked twice and now is the third time. Stop running away/