View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Old June 21st 15, 05:34 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Lawrence Jenkins Lawrence Jenkins is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default OT or OT , who knows anymore? Oh those 0.1 % of Scientist.

On Sunday, 21 June 2015 17:26:14 UTC+1, RedAcer wrote:
On 21/06/15 15:35, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:06:44 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
There's no 'right' and no wrong in science, as I've attested to on
here any times.there is no proof, though deniers want there to be.
The best you'll get is a consensus amongst scientists. In this
case, the consensus is huge, at 99.9% in the latest literature
survey. What does that suggest about CO2 being the major cause of
global warming.

A good analogy is gravity. The theory of gravity is not proven and
never will be. However, if I was stood under a falling piano, I'd
be inclined to do my best to get out of the way. A denier, however
would be still telling anyone in hearing distance that the theory
is a bunch of crap. Right up to the end. 😀




You're analogy of gravity I pure tosh. I'll tell you why you idiot,
we can see gravity working on the earth every day , very hour, every
second but we have no evidence whatsoever of co2 heating the
atmosphere, do we?

Please show this evidence to me and your follower.


It's in any book on atmospheric physics, or just use google.



What, that co2 is a green house gas in a laboratory? Co2 levels changed with temperature long before our ancestors first lit a fire and put the kettle on.