On Sunday, 21 June 2015 17:44:05 UTC+1, RedAcer wrote:
On 21/06/15 17:34, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 21 June 2015 17:26:14 UTC+1, RedAcer wrote:
On 21/06/15 15:35, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:06:44 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
There's no 'right' and no wrong in science, as I've attested to
on here any times.there is no proof, though deniers want there
to be. The best you'll get is a consensus amongst scientists.
In this case, the consensus is huge, at 99.9% in the latest
literature survey. What does that suggest about CO2 being the
major cause of global warming.

A good analogy is gravity. The theory of gravity is not proven
and never will be. However, if I was stood under a falling
piano, I'd be inclined to do my best to get out of the way. A
denier, however would be still telling anyone in hearing
distance that the theory is a bunch of crap. Right up to the
end. 😀



You're analogy of gravity I pure tosh. I'll tell you why you
idiot, we can see gravity working on the earth every day , very
hour, every second but we have no evidence whatsoever of co2
heating the atmosphere, do we?

Please show this evidence to me and your follower.

It's in any book on atmospheric physics, or just use google.



What, that co2 is a green house gas in a laboratory?

Yes, AFAIK.

Co2 levels
changed with temperature long before our ancestors first lit a fire
and put the kettle on.
Yes that's true, and the temperature went up then. There's strong
evidence that CO2 from volcanoes warmed the planet after the
'snowball-earth' period.



Just cooked fathers day Sunday lunch and now they've all done their duty and cleared off. So right. Oh yes this issue of volcanoes spewing out c02 has been raised before. I'm not sure where we are with this one as the AGW side claim that Volcanoes now hardly belch out any c02? Do they and how much do they contribute?