
June 22nd 15, 09:33 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,367
|
|
OT or OT , who knows anymore? Oh those 0.1 % of Scientist.
"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 3:02:13 PM UTC+1, Col wrote:
In the instance of gravity, how much proof do you want??
We know how it works, we know what the equations are. We can
'slingshot' spaceprobes around planets in order to accelerate them.
And lo and behold the probes end up where we want them.
How could we do that if the theory wasn't 'proven'?
--
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg
We know global warming is occurring and 99.9% of all published material on
the subject points to CO2 being the cause. How much more "proof do you
want, Well actually, you can carry on asking for it until you are blue in
the face, but you'll never get it.
Research proof in science. You'll see I'm absolutely correct. There is
none. You just have very well established theories that *so far* have
stood the test of time.
Fair enough, but to intents and practical purposes it is *proof*.
--
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg
|