OT or OT , who knows anymore? Oh those 0.1 % of Scientist.
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:16:27 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 22 June 2015 17:42:11 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
I'm afraid it is not. Please research this.
That was exactly the intended irony, but alas beyond you.
It had nothing to do with irony. You haven't a clue about the concept of proof in science as you have asked for it many times and you will ask for it again, as you are incapable of learning and have no wish to do so. Most others on here do, however, a few still don't.
There is no proof in science and there never will be. Clear?
|