On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 5:56:34 PM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Thursday, 6 August 2015 16:13:18 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 3:52:09 PM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
Dawlish,

On Page 576 of University Physics with Modern Physics, Technology Update, Thirteenth Edition (2010), which continues to set the benchmark for clarity and rigor combined with effective teaching and research-based innovation, they write:

"Radiation. Heat transfer by radiation is important in some surprising places. A premature baby in an incubator can be cooled dangerously by radiation if the walls of the incubator happened to be cold, even when the air in the incubator is warm. Some incubators regulate the temperature measuring the baby's skin ..."

Hot objects radiate heat which warms adjacent objects. Cold objects radiate cold which cools adjects objects. The latter is difficult to demonstrate because it is more difficult to maintain a constant cold temperature than a high temperture. The latter is easy using electrical heating. However, holding a thermnometer over an object taken from a freezer will cause the temperature shown to drop.

I hope you will now realise that you are wrong, will apologise and admit your mistake. Cold radiation does exist.

Cheers, Alastair.

This explains it to you. You can access any number of other academic explanations. You will not find a single one which tells you that heat moves from cool to hot, unless and external energy supply is applied. Now stop this silly belief you have and don't make this proposal again.

http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/mod_tech/node79.html

I find your posts so insulting I have difficulty reading them.

I know. It's because they tell you that you are clearly and unambiguously wrong. No-one likes being told that, so they are difficult for you to read. I understand that you don't like that, but it doesn't change the fact that I and everyone else who has replied to you has told you that you are wrong and that any scientist would tell you clearly that you are wrong. Cold radiation simply does not exist and it's a shame you can't recognise that. The fact that you can't leaves you in a very poor light, I can assure you. You won't like that either and will probably hate me as a result. Water and duck's there, because you are proposing idiocy and everyone with a brain in this newsgroup knows you are.


No!

Because you are a stupid arrogant little ****!

Abuse. That's what happens when people are backed into a corner, because they are hopelessly and inescapably wrong.

Cold radiation is a figment of your imagination and if you have any sense, you will not mention it again in this *science* newsgroup. However, I fear you have not that sense. Thus, the reaction you get to proposing such idiocy will not be my fault, Alastair.


Cheers, Alastair.