August 10th 15, 08:10 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
|
|
Four questions (with answers)
On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 10:05:41 PM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 21:43:38 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 7:34:06 PM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 19:02:26 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
It is similar to the case of active satellite imagery where there is
radiation passing in both directions. People don't seem to be able to grasp
that it is the net radiation transfer which dictates heat flows from hot to
cold. Radiation is still passing from cold to hot.
Now going for my lunch, and hoping I will not need to return to this again
You can do whatever you wish. By now the laughter surrounding your ridiculous proposition will be audible to even you, as you eat..
Again. His only mistake seems to be that he has said 'grasp' instead of
'teach me', but even then it's beginning to look as though we have
achieved even that.
--
Alan LeHun
Alan,
So you think, like Dawlish, that the radiation from a cold object will not cool a warmer one?
On this issue, the whole of science thinks like Dawlish.
The whole of this news group seem to think like you, but that is because we have not been told what you think. Everyone, imagines you beleive that same as them.
Does a cold object cool a hot one? See my four questions. You have not answered them yet.
You don't, which is a pity, really. *))
Read my first reply to you instead of bleating.
The answers are contained in the second law of thermodynamics - which does not need re-writing, following your silliness about 'cold radiation'.
|