On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 10:19:03 AM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 August 2015 08:30:26 UTC+1, Martin Brown wrote:
On 10/08/2015 20:26, Alastair McDonald wrote:
"Martin Brown" wrote in message
...

He isn't interested in the truth, only in making me appear foolish.

You have excelled in quest that by your original post and inability to
comprehend explanations given to you by several posters now. Your attempt
to demean Dawlish has backfired and made you look ignorant, stubborn,
unwilling to leanr and stupid in roughly equal measure.

Yes :-(

I am only interested in the truth.

Well then, read the Pictet experiment, but be prepared for a shock.

*I* understand the Pictet experment. You *clearly* do not and you are
parading your now wilful ignorance here endlessly just like a netkook.

Your lack of understanding of basic physics is exposed. You are a crank!

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

You have lost your temper, and lost the argument.

Goodbye

Alastair.

Nothing you say works, Alastair, does it? Even this pathetic little attempt to squirm away.

This wasn't you then, within the first 20 posts, was it? 'Because you are a stupid arrogant little ****!'

You resorted to abuse a long time ago, on this thread, when you realised questions were being asked of you that you couldn't answer.

Your resort to Pictet (again, you didn't learn the first time) has gone (and indeed, did a century ago) so what possible other justification do you have for believing in 'cold radiation'.

You believe this; no-one else in the whole of published science does and no-one on this newsgroup supports you. If someone else persisted in proposing something as daft as this, what would you call them? A crank? An idiot?

Think about it.