On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 10:20:09 AM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 August 2015 08:46:39 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 8:30:26 AM UTC+1, Martin Brown wrote:
On 10/08/2015 20:26, Alastair McDonald wrote:
"Martin Brown" wrote in message
...

He isn't interested in the truth, only in making me appear foolish.

You have excelled in quest that by your original post and inability to
comprehend explanations given to you by several posters now. Your attempt
to demean Dawlish has backfired and made you look ignorant, stubborn,
unwilling to leanr and stupid in roughly equal measure.

Yes :-(

I am only interested in the truth.

Well then, read the Pictet experiment, but be prepared for a shock.

*I* understand the Pictet experment. You *clearly* do not and you are
parading your now wilful ignorance here endlessly just like a netkook..

Your lack of understanding of basic physics is exposed. You are a crank!

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

I used the term 'idiot'. Hope you don't mind.

I did not want to be rude to Martin, and tell him he just another Dawlish..

Odd that you wish to fixate on one person, when so many have told you that your ideas are nonsensical, stupid and cranky (none of them my terms).

It's what people like you do to try to justify what they believe to themselves. It's exactly what happens with climate deniers and you are no different. You deny the science and propose that you know better than everyone else.. That makes you clearly an idiot and I believe there would be very few on here that would disagree with that statement after your foray into 'cold radiation'.

Just accept you are completely wrong and change your mind. People will think far better of you if you do and will put this in the past, if you demonstrate that you can learn.