On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 2:58:24 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
If you find a thread 'depressing', why do you read it, when you don't have to?

Well, not being psychic I was not aware of it's pointlessly repetitive content until I'd read it. It started fine with clear responses from RedAcre, Stephen, Bernard, Alan & others, and then should have stopped.

The title of group moderator doesn't have an owner on usenet and never will.

What the f**k are you on about now?! What the hell has that got to do with my post? (Which unlike yours contained some reference to the weather).

Christ you're irritating.

Graham
Penzance

What, you didn't read your own post about complaining about contributions to another thread? Sorry, I was under the impression you wrote it.

To explain: your post contained reference to 'cold radiation' in title and content and you whined about not being happy about the 'cold radiation' thread's length. Hence my 'group moderator' comment. The length of the thread and its continuation has nothing to do with you, but you thought you'd add your two penn'orth on a different thread under the guise of a weather post. If you'd just posted about the weather, I can assure you you'd have got no adverse comments, but you knew exactly what you were doing.

Please feel free to write whatever you wish, but try not to throw a foul-mouthed hissy fit and chuck your toys out of the pram when you don't like someone's reply to what you have written.

:-)